In any organization, underperformers can be a challenging issue, especially when they are otherwise likeable. While it might seem harmless to keep a friendly but underperforming employee, the hidden costs can be significant. In this blog post, we will explore the history and impact of keeping underperformers, understand the psychology behind it, and provide actionable advice on how to address it effectively in the workplace.
The History and Research on Underperformance
Underperformance in the workplace has been a topic of extensive research. Studies have shown that keeping underperforming employees can lead to a significant decrease in overall team performance and morale. According to a study by Gallup, disengaged employees cost U.S. companies up to $550 billion annually in lost productivity. This staggering statistic underscores the importance of addressing underperformance promptly and effectively.
Further research by Harvard Business Review reveals that 80% of employees feel that their bosses are hesitant to address underperformance because they fear confrontation or harming the workplace atmosphere. This reluctance leads to a culture where mediocrity is tolerated, which can erode the high-performance standards essential for organizational success.
The Impact of Underperformers on the Work Environment
Keeping underperformers in the workplace can have several negative impacts, which significantly outweigh any short-term benefits. Here are some of the major downsides:
Decreased Productivity: An underperforming employee often requires others to pick up their slack, leading to decreased overall productivity and increased workload for high-performing employees.
Lowered Morale: High performers may become demotivated when they see underperformers being tolerated, leading to resentment and a potential decline in their own performance.
Increased Turnover: Talented employees may leave the organization if they feel that their hard work is not recognized or valued, while underperformers are allowed to stay.
Damaged Team Dynamics: The presence of an underperformer can disrupt team cohesion and create an environment of frustration and dissatisfaction.
Reputational Damage: The organization's reputation can suffer if clients or stakeholders perceive that it tolerates poor performance, potentially leading to lost business opportunities.
The Psychology Behind Tolerating Underperformers
The reluctance to address underperformance often stems from several psychological factors. Managers may fear confrontation and the potential fallout from terminating an employee, especially if the individual is well-liked. There is also the “nice” bias, where being pleasant and agreeable is mistakenly equated with competence and productivity. This bias can cloud judgment and lead to the retention of underperformers at the expense of organizational efficiency.
Additionally, managers might avoid giving critical feedback due to discomfort or a lack of proper training on how to deliver it constructively. This avoidance behavior results in underperformers not receiving the necessary guidance to improve, further perpetuating the cycle of poor performance.
Addressing Underperformance in the Workplace
Addressing underperformance requires a systematic and empathetic approach. Here are some steps that can help:
Set Clear Expectations: Clearly define the roles and responsibilities of each employee. Establish measurable goals and performance standards to provide a benchmark for success.
Provide Regular Feedback: Conduct regular performance reviews and provide constructive feedback. Make sure the feedback is specific, actionable, and focuses on behaviors rather than personal attributes.
Check out our blogs on giving feedback: 7 employee feedback models and 8 examples of effective feedback.
Develop a Performance Improvement Plan: Create a plan that outlines specific areas for improvement, sets realistic goals, and includes a timeline for achieving these goals. Provide the necessary support and resources to help the employee succeed.
Engage with Empathy: Approach the conversation with empathy and understanding. Acknowledge the employee’s strengths and express a genuine desire to help them improve.
Follow Through: Monitor progress regularly and hold follow-up meetings to discuss improvements or further issues. Consistency is key to ensuring that the performance improvement plan is effective.
Exiting the Employee: If, after following the feedback and the Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) process, the employee fails to improve, it may be necessary to consider exiting them from the organization. This step, while difficult, is essential to maintain overall team performance and morale.
For more insights on managing workplace challenges, listen to our podcast, "Monster in My Closet," where we delve deeper into topics like underperformance, leadership, and team dynamics. Check out our other blog posts, including "Monster in My Closet Show Notes," for additional tips and strategies to create a high-performing and engaged workplace.
Comments